Search for: "David v. David" Results 7441 - 7460 of 19,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
David Savage reports on the Voter ID case here. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
  Conservative MP David Davis called the result a “victory for free speech” The BBC, The Guardian and The Independent covered the decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:45 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Kogan v Martin is explained brilliantly in this guest Kat post here. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel Mendez, J.), entered February 22, 2017, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a stay of eviction, and order, same court and Justice, entered August 4, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants David Kaminsky, Danielle Kaminsky (together, the Kaminsky defendants), Jeffrey Asher, Robinson Brog Leinwand, Green, Genovese & Gluck P.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am by Amy Howe
At Balkinization, David Gans discusses the amicus brief that the Constitutional Accountability Center filed in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
 ITMA opens the lid on Trunki David Brophy brings you the news from ITMA's panel discussion on the practical implications of the Trunki decision (courtesy of Lydia Birch and David Coldham of Gowlings). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Sandy Levinson
There is much to agree with in David Marcus’s post, especially about the wide-open questions presented with regard to the actual conduct of an “Article V Convention. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Finally, there's a lengthy analysis by David Musker of Kohler Mira v Bristan, a rare case on pecuniary and non-pecuniary relief for design infringement, on Class 99.Lex specialis. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am by Jay Willis
Times and in its blog, David Savage covers the cert. grant in Snyder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In Wasserman v Freilich [2016] EWHC 312 (QB), Sir David Eady remarked at the end of his judgment that “an allegation of dishonesty, fraud or attempted fraud will usually fall fairly and squarely on the side of fact rather than opinion. [read post]