Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
., doing business as Empire Gas, and owners Ali Yuzbasioglu and Sukru Ilgin, will pay the Labor Department $39,077 in civil money penalties and interest for the violations The suit (Solis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
The English committee, as well as agencies and instrumentalities of the United Kingdom, cannot file a request, but an attorney acting for himself may, and the dissemination to the foreign persons would be legal. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
But in truth the Convention is not always to blame in these cases; sometimes deportation can run aground on a strict interpretation of English statute law without the help of human rights, as the case below demonstrates. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 1:58 am
The English law courts are closed until 17 April 2012, Parliament is not sitting again until 26 April 2012. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:31 pm
In Bazemore v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:59 pm
The cases are Viacom International Inc et al v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
In Southern Seeding Service, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:55 am
Over the last term there was one libel case in the Supreme Court (Flood v Times Newspapers) and two in the Court of Appeal (Cambridge v Makin and Ashcroft v Foley). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:18 pm
(See People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:59 am
Compensation for court document translations, as mentioned in a previous legal translation blog post, and the Supreme Court's decision in Taniguchi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:45 pm
Case Information The Financial Services Authority (Appellant) v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
” In plain English, it’s an advertising method. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
The Glaxo case before the Federal Court of Appeal in turn cited the English House of Lords decision in Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
"On 17 November 2011 the Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen was published in eight languages, none of them English [though there's a good note [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Joint Equity Committee of Investors of Real Estate Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:29 am
Gregg and another v Pigott and others [2012] EWHC 732 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 104 “The phrase ‘statutory next of kin’ in an English settlement made in 1948 should be construed in such a way as to eliminate discrimination against adopted children by virtue of articles 8 and 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.” WLR Daily, 29th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12, 26/03/2012. [read post]
