Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 12,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Ge v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Indeed, Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2013] EWHC 3624 (Ch) is a 20 November decision of Mrs Justice Asplin in the Chancery Division (High Court, England and Wales) which would have been posted here ages ago if the IPKat had fewer interesting cases to write about and more time in which to write about them.Specialty -- the claimant in these proceedings -- specialised in the distribution and sale of pharmaceutical products,… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:56 pm
New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., and People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:57 pm
Consider, for example, the case of Lynch v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:47 am
The case Kilopass v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
On November 26, 2013, the Benefits Review Board issued its decision in Bell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Andrew Holowchak, Framing a Legend: Exposing the Distorted History of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings (Prometheus Books, 2013).In her State of the Field essay, "The Complicated Histories of Emancipation," Manisha Sinha (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) reviews James Oakes, Freedom National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861–1865 (W. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
In 1993, this practice led to the Utah Supreme Court ruling in East Jordan Irrigation Company v Morgan, commonly known as "the East Jordan Case." [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 5:38 pm
Sharon Shakargy, Marriage by the State or Married to the State? [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:55 am
In Baanyan Software Services Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:32 am
For instance, in Mizrahi v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
On Afro-IP, Caroline NCube's series on African states' IP policy takes her alphabetically from Cameroon to Comoros. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
(Chambers v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:38 am
Larry Pitt & Associates v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:22 am
In addition, Directive 293 stated that TRICARE providers could be subject to OFCCP jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
The only thing we found in the device field similar to §§201.57 and 201.80 was 21 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
However, the use of international human rights law to affect a paradigm shift in analyzing domestic violence cases and other gendered crimes such as trafficking is a hot topic in the United States since the 2011 decision in Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v. [read post]
