Search for: "T A V Holdings Inc" Results 7441 - 7460 of 12,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am by Nedim Malovic
However, since some of the goods covered by the marks are aimed primarily at a public of professionals, the level of attention of that public (with regard to those goods) will be higher than that of the general public (T-449/15, Satkirit Holdings v OHIM).Comparison of the goodsAs regards the assessment of lighting mixers in Class 9 covered by the earlier mark and the goods in Class 11 covered by the Applicant’s mark, the General Court observed that it was common… [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:23 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Piercing the corporate veil can be difficult because “domination alone does not suffice without an additional showing that it led to inequity, fraud, or malfeasance” (TMCC, Inc. v Jennifer Convertibles, Inc., 176 AD3d 1135 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by Richard Hunt
† Risky business The Independence Project, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:51 am by TJ McIntyre
Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Damache v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Holds frequently just "disappear" from the docket and aren't affirmatively relisted; also, there's no evident reason to hold, so it's probably the latter. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:45 am by Barry Barnett
Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc., 673 F.3d 221, 233 (3d Cir. 2012) (quoting Thibodeau v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:14 am
* Ken Adams blogs on Affinity Internet, Inc. v. [read post]