Search for: "US v. Weekes"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 39,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:48 pm
So far, there does not appear to have been any significant decline in filings compared to the same period in the past two years, or at least no decline that can be discerned amid the ‘noise’ of normal week-to-week fluctuations. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Last Week in the Courts The trial of the data protection case of Greystoke v Financial Conduct Authority which was due to take place On 6 May 2020 the Court of Appeal (Flaux, Popplewell and Dingemans LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Wright v Ver. [read post]
10 May 2020, 1:41 pm
Car that’s late moots plate debate.United States v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:18 am
In Roberts v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:05 am
In Ilias and Ahmed v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 3:28 am
Decisions this Week India Balu Gopalakrishnan v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 pm
The Supreme Court Could Use the First Amendment to Unleash a Robocall Nightmare By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps looks at the recently argued case, Barr v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
Two weeks later, however, Joshua Nussbaum, President of Revolution, filed a trademark appli- cation for the Diesel Test mark to be used in connection with dietary and nutritional supplements. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:19 am
T-Mobile USA The very next week after that ruling, the same appellate court reversed another punitive damage award in the disability discrimination case of Colucci v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:25 am
Sit back, relax and catch up on last week's news! [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:30 am
Numero uno this week can only be the fact that, on Wednesday, somebody flushed a toilet during the live but “virtual” argument in Barr v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:19 am
(HC 2109/20 Ben Meir v. [read post]
