Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 10,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
The term infringing activity means an activity that (A) infringes a copyright under section 506 of title 17, United States Code; (B) violates section 1201 of title 17, United States Code; or (C) uses counterfeit marks in a manner that violates section 32(1) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1113(1)). (5) INTERNET ADVERTISING SERVICE. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
S. 167, 174 (2001) (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
’Murphy v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Or, consider the 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
In Sequenom, v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:55 am
In the United States, it has only been staged in New York four times, but the play has been staged more frequently in England – most recently in 2004. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Roberts opens the session with the traditional script: “I have the honor to announce, on behalf of the court, that the October 2017 term of the Supreme Court of the United States is now closed, and the October 2018 term is now convened. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:31 am
United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
Yet Europe and the United States are at loggerheads over how regulation fits in the Rethink. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm
” This self-appointed task has a huge influence on the development of the law in the United States, and indeed around the world, mostly for the better. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:55 am
At yesterday’s oral argument in Murr v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
And only one of these decisions found that substantial transformation occurred in the United States, [v] with the other decisions concluding that substantial transformation occurred internationally. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:28 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:11 am
"I commend our investigators for their expeditious efforts and thoroughness in identifying this problem," said NTSB Chairman Mark V. [read post]
