Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 7461 - 7480 of 95,168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm by Alden Abbott
   The FTC issued an administrative complaint against Petitioner in August 2016 alleging that the thirteen settlement agreements and the Luxottica agreement, … along with subsequent actions to enforce them, unreasonably restrain truthful, non-misleading advertising as well as price competition in search advertising auctions, all of which constitute a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm by Amy Howe
He urged the justices to reject the “jurisdictional free-for-all” for which Mallory argues. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:56 am by Amy Howe
The federal district court ruled for the plaintiffs, holding that ICWA is unconstitutional, but a three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner appealed the District Court's ruling.In response to Appellant's appeal the Circuit Court of Appealsl, Second Circuit, [Second Circuit] said it reviews "a grant of summary judgment de novo," drawing all reasonable inferences and resolve all factual ambiguities in favor of the nonmoving party. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner appealed the District Court's ruling.In response to Appellant's appeal the Circuit Court of Appealsl, Second Circuit, [Second Circuit] said it reviews "a grant of summary judgment de novo," drawing all reasonable inferences and resolve all factual ambiguities in favor of the nonmoving party. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Additionally, the comment combined the most egregious of all racial insults (the n-word) with a vile stereotype dating back to chattel slavery (being lazy). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Laura Dooley and Rodger Citron
In that case, the Supreme Court held that courts could exercise specific jurisdiction over Ford in cases involving plaintiffs suing in their own home states in which they had suffered harm allegedly because of defendant Ford’s vehicles, even though Ford’s contacts with the state did not directly cause plaintiffs’ harm.When a plaintiff chooses to sue elsewhere, as here, that choice looks like forum shopping, which the Court generally frowns upo [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm by David Kopel
Carry bans in "restricted locations" (all homes and businesses that are not "sensitive locations"). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:12 pm by Kristen E. Larson
Plaintiff alleged the account agreement required the credit union to use the ledger-balance to assess NSF fees and only assess one NSF fee per transaction. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm by lennyesq
 Musk-owned companies have now faced 3 WARN Act lawsuits alleging the same thing Brandon Vigliarolo Filed yesterday on behalf of five named plaintiffs “and all others similarly situated” in Musk’s layoff sights, the suit accuses Twitter of terminating employees without the 60-day notice for mass layoffs, which the the Department of Labor defines[PDF] as including at least 50 employees that make up at least a third of a company’s workforce within a… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 1:12 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
Section 1983, enacted as Section 1 of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, authorizes private suits against any person acting under color of state law who deprives the plaintiff of rights “secured by the Constitution and laws. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint seeks to recover damages on behalf of the plaintiff class. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:09 pm by Amy Howe
If the justices answer “yes,” businesses could soon be sued for all types of claims in many or all of the states where they do business. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:44 am by Tom Smith
Congress expressly gave federal district courts “original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:56 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
FedEx’s counsel reportedly told the jury that FedEx did not qualify as a joint employer, that trial evidence would show that FedEx had no role in the hiring or termination of the drivers, and that Bay Rim, not FedEx, controlled all paychecks and employment conditions related to the drivers. [read post]