Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:37 am
English: A collection of pictograms. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:35 am
See, e.g., Totes, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
Since the Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc [2014] 1 SLR 911, the comparison of trade marks in Singapore has invariably involved the question of technical distinctiveness.Technical distinctivness refers to the capacity of a trade mark to operate as a badge of origin. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th November… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
Language Line Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:21 pm
GermanyBILD v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm
SpainGoogle v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am
In this feature we revisit some older posts which may still be of current interest. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
This case law is developing at a rapid pace and, on the basis of the current approach of the English Courts, it will have to be “integrated” into the new law of privacy. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
This case law is developing at a rapid pace and, on the basis of the current approach of the English Courts, it will have to [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:42 am
There is no legal doctrine of force majeure under English law. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
In those cases, a claimant would only be permitted to bring a claim in the English courts if this is “clearly the most appropriate place” in which to bring such a claim. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
(I’m very pleased to welcome Antoine Dusséaux from Doctrine as a guest contributor on this post. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the surrendering or the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
