Search for: "Line v. People" Results 7461 - 7480 of 13,534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
It is clear that most of the people chattering across the Internet on either side have never read the bill (arguably, many who voted on did not either). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Colorado handed down the first state supreme court case on the law of reverse keyword searches for Google terms: People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:43 pm by Tyler S St Cyr
 Bottom line: Play nice even when it is really hard. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Hurst’s petition originally posed two questions spanning fifteen lines of text, but in granting cert., the Court limited review to just one question, occupying more like two lines: whether Florida’s capital sentencing scheme violates the Sixth Amendment or Eighth Amendment in light of Ring v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If so, how should we draw the lines between different subject matter? [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
For some related though different thoughts on the subject by Justice Scalia, see his concurrence in Sable Communications v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:00 am
We don't know what that title means; we just wanted to draw some mathematicians to our blog.Well, no.Actually, we just read United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm
MGA attorneys countered that the jury should award Mattel as little as $30 million because the company had built the doll line's value with smart additions, branding and packaging. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
The lawsuit also alleges that the conduct of the drainage districts, together with the conduct of similarly situated districts, contributes to a single, indivisible harm Point Source Bottom line, the DMWW complaint is asking a federal court court to do what no other court or state or federal agency has done: declare farm drainage tile to be a “point source” subject to CWA regulation. [read post]