Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 16,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am
And in the case raised by Andrew, Welch v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
The case is Tighe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
A somewhat unusual effect of the rule appears in the April 13, 2016 decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Palydowycz v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 2:52 pm
In Holt v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 8:23 am
” Andon, LLC v City of Newport News, Va., 813 F3d 510 (VA 2/9/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
* Handshoe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
It puts other people uncomfortably in the middle of the friction between you and your ex-wife and they don't want to hear that. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
Union, Local 25 v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am
If a system runs fast, people probably aren't getting effective representation; too slow and people sit in jail. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:02 am
Threshold Media Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
The starting point was therefore that the original interim injunction was correctly granted. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:47 am
This clearly qualifies as "metadata" under Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:54 pm
This made it inevitable that an application would be made to remove him from command and very likely granted (as it was). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:18 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Patterson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:15 am
There is no such evidence in this case.The case is Myers v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:23 am
” Granting summary judgment on this claim, the court noted that it was based solely on the audio recording of comments he made during a “staff meeting” involving at least four people. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department of… [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Texas in the end”; and Lisa Soronen, who at the NCSL Blog notes that the case “is about different things for different people. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
