Search for: "R Thomas" Results 7461 - 7480 of 19,983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 10:56 pm
Pace, 898 F.2d 1218, 1243 (7th Cir. 1990); Thomas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:35 pm
Over the time period at issue, Justices Scalia and Thomas agreed 90% of the time, as did Justices Alito and Thomas and Justices Sotomayor and Ginsburg. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
P v Q v R ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q v R ~Q­­­_____ ∴ R Hence, the term, “iterative disjunctive syllogism. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
 Two Justices (Alito and Thomas) reiterated their disagreement with Mass v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm by Guest Author
Thomas Assembly Bill 218 (“AB 218”), codified as Labor Code section 432.9, goes into effect in just over a week on Tuesday, July 1, 2014, and will have a significant impact on a public agency’s ability to initially use criminal convictions in the hiring processes before a determination has been made regarding whether the applicant meets the minimum job qualifications for the position. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:49 am by James R. Marsh
., BJS Statistician, Jana Kemp, Amy Rathbun, and Simone Robers, American Institutes for Research, Thomas D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
Justice Thomas, joined by Justices Scalia and Alito, wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in which he contended that the Court should have overturned Basic. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
Jan Niklas Rolf, The state of nature analogy in International Relations theorySam Raphael & Doug Stokes, US oil strategy in the Caspian Basin: Hegemony through interdependenceAndrés Villar Gertner, The Beagle Channel frontier dispute between Argentina and Chile: Converging domestic and international conflictsTyler M Curley, Methodological process ethics in international theoryForumRichard N Lebow & Thomas Lindemann, Symbolic and cultural approaches to the origins of… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:16 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas asked whether dismissal wasn’t a bit harsh, given that the statute isn’t exactly the epitome of clarity. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Barry Barnett
Justice Thomas, also concurring, explained why he would overrule Basic. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
Justice Alito wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, joined by Justice Thomas. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Matt Danzer
Curbing NSA Activities Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Thomas Massie (R-KY) sponsored an amendment that prevents any US intelligence officials from using appropriated funds to conduct “backdoor searches,” or using an US person identifier to query foreign intelligence information collected under the Section 702 program. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
” The Court properly left the constitutional questions raised by these scenarios for another day, Thomas stated. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:55 pm by Mark Summerfield
On 19 June 2014 the US Supreme Court handed down its keenly-awaited decision in Alice Corporation Pty Ltd v CLS Bank International, ruling that Alice’s claims directed to a computer-implemented scheme for mitigating settlement risk in finacial transactions are ineligible for patent protection.The case was widely regarded as being about the patentability of software, perhaps because the question presented to the Court by Alice was ‘whether claims to computer-implemented inventions –… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:31 pm
The Alchemist Theatre must shut down the production after only 1 performance (before which the sex of the "Carol" actor was kept hidden):"Oleanna," introduced to audiences shortly after the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas hearings in 1991, centers on the relationship between a professor and a female student who accuses him of harassment and rape....In a statement issued Friday evening, Erica Case and Aaron Kopec, owners of Alchemist Theatre, said: "We excitedly brought… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm
Carol Pope, who presided for the panel, and Justice Thomas M. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Justice Thomas (joined by Scalia and Alito) wrote a concurring opinion to explain that this case did not address employees who testify as part of their job duties (like a designated representative or a police officer who testifies regularly as part of his or her job duties).Sidenote: The employee in this case won, but still lost, as the defendant was granted qualified immunity. [read post]