Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 7461 - 7480 of 41,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2014, 10:39 am by Lyle Denniston
Circuit Court, leading twenty-one states, the trade group for the power plants, and the trade group for the suppliers of coal to those plants to take the case on to the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:49 am
Keep an eye on the various dormant commerce challenges to state-level energy and climate policies (e.g. subsidies for in-state renewable power, low-carbon fuel standards, etc.). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm by Matthew David Brozik
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:32 am by Steven Cohen
 His report stated that power surges are rare and that there was no abnormal electrical activity on the day of the alleged surge. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:52 pm by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.htmlTwo petitions for certiorari were filed last week on 12/3/21: United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*Thus, explained the court, "an employee charged with failing to possess a minimum qualification of his or her position is only entitled to notice of the charge and the opportunity to contest it" and dismissed Petitioner’s action.* See, for example: Fowler v City of Saratoga Springs, 215 A.D.2d 819 (City Engineer lawfully dismissed for failure to obtain Professional Engineer’s license by a specified date); Meliti v Nyquist, 53 AD2d 951, affirmed 41 NY2d 183… [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:04 pm by Unknown
United States (Bureau of Indian Affairs; 638 Contract) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMakah Indian Tribe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:56 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
On March 1, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (“First Circuit”) held in Rodríguez-López v. [read post]