Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 7461 - 7480 of 23,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
See, e.g., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 5:53 am by Jonathan Abel
It’s impossible to know because we can’t effectively compare the quality of reports in open-records states with those in confidential-records states (because the confidential records are, well, confidential). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm by Suzanne Ito
Which state refused a mandatory ultrasound bill this week? [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:11 am by B.W. Barnett
—Texarkana 2007, pet. ref‘d).At least we know that enhancement isn't automatic - although I still don't think the hurdle is too high for the State to jump in cases such as these. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:54 am by Tobias Lutzi
La Cour a ainsi jugé avec constance que l’article 4 du Protocole no 7 ne visait que les « juridictions du même État » et ne faisait donc pas obstacle à ce qu’une personne soit poursuivie ou punie pénalement par les juridictions d’un État partie à la Convention en raison d’une infraction pour laquelle elle avait été acquittée ou condamnée par un jugement… [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:16 am by Jack Bogdanski
They didn't do that in Martin, and I'd be surprised if they did that here. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Hill, Elizabeth Slattery and Ethan Blevins observe that “[t]he vast majority of private schools in the United States are religiously affiliated,” and that thanks to the court’s ruling last week in Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
  This is:Our preemption idea harks back to PLIVA v. [read post]