Search for: "US v. Weekes"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 39,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:41 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am
Merricks v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:00 am
Mazars/Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:13 am
The case is Friends of Danny DeVito et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:00 am
As always, tweet your questions to @PreetBharara with hashtag #askpreet, email us at staytuned@cafe.com, or call 669-247-7338 to leave a voicemail. [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:55 pm
State of Nevada (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:04 pm
State of Nevada (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:11 pm
In Marez v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
But in recent weeks, as outside calls for remote voting or a similar solution have grown louder, an expanding number of legislators from both parties have voiced increased public support for some form of remote voting. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:53 pm
This week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
Less than two weeks ago, the House Democratic leadership seemed to scuttle a modest proposal to amend the chamber’s rules to permit remote voting by proxy and remote hearings, but then last week they revived the possibility of a vote on those proposed changes sometime in the future. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:50 am
The petitions of the week are below the jump: Baker v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:12 am
The CDC explains that this is due to differences in record keeping that cause the CDC’s numbers to lag a couple weeks behind. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:10 am
The court held in Ben Meir v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:41 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held last week, in Medley v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:29 am
Stephen V. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
Deliberation between Member States should be facilitated in order to encourage policy-learning and (so far as possible) coordination in the use of such derogatory clauses. [read post]
