Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 7481 - 7500 of 13,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Fugua Industries, Inc. 541 F.2d 584 (6th Cir. 1976); Normandy Place Assoc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm by Bruce Boyden
So show it on multiple wall-sized TV screens plastered all over the house, it doesn’t matter, copyright has nothing to say about that. 2. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
So show it on multiple wall-sized TV screens plastered all over the house, it doesn’t matter, copyright has nothing to say about that. 2. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
So show it on multiple wall-sized TV screens plastered all over the house, it doesn’t matter, copyright has nothing to say about that. 2. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
  Risk/utility vs. consumer expectation in the context of preemption under Bartlett simply doesn’t matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:46 am
[T]he Huffs laid down on their hotel bed and. . . . continued to discuss airport personnel matters and McGraw, and Spaw continued to record what she overheard. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Larry Bell] Reminder: California’s Prop 65 doesn’t actually improve public health, makes lawyers rich, and harasses business [Michael Marlow, WSJ] “What I learned from six months of GMO research: None of it matters” [Nathanael Johnson, Grist] Eminent domain threatens store owner in Fire Island’s Saltaire [NYP] In case you haven’t seen this one: chemical content of all-natural foods [James Kennedy Monash] “The court… [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
Hypothetically, if all the conditions for when enforcement of the policy is optimal can be spelled out in the statute and made a condition of valid enforcement, it doesn’t matter whether you enforce by state employees or through the citizens at large, or through any intermediate method like state boards or industry associations. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
By the time this Kat got down to reading the decision of the Sixth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union in Case T‑320/10 Fürstlich Castell’sches Domänenamt Albrecht Fürst Zu Castell-Castell v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks And Designs) (OHIM), Castel Frères Sas, dating back to 13 September last, it was no longer topical and he decided not to write it up. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 4:30 pm by Lysander Johnson
It can be and often is a matter of life and death to have appropriate safety gear that doesn’t come apart at the seams when you most need it. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Liability may attach if the officer is adjudged in hindsight to have acted outside the scope of his or her delegated authority or to have failed to act on a matter that was not (sic) within his or her expected areas of responsibility.[8]   More recently, five decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the business judgment rule applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Liability may attach if the officer is adjudged in hindsight to have acted outside the scope of his or her delegated authority or to have failed to act on a matter that was not (sic) within his or her expected areas of responsibility.[8]   More recently, five decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the business judgment rule applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
  Compounding matters, Lance also included gratuitous dictum suggesting that a post-sale duty to warn may exist in prescription drug cases, id. at 167-68 – despite that theory being a form of strict liability, which Pennsylvania doesn’t recognize at all in prescription medical product litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”Opponents also testified that their CPCs didn’t mislead patients. [read post]