Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 7481 - 7500
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
In Myers v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 am
In late July 1974, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am
Without this the level and extent of protection is unclear, and the mark should not be registered, since "…if the authorities and the public are left in a state of confusion as to the nature of the sign then these requirements will not be satisfied".Lord Justice Kitchin further noted that, when considering the precise make-up on a mark, one has to consider both the pictorial representation and the description that accompanies it. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
’ The second search, done on June 5, 2012, searched for `polygraph legal in which states. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 5:11 am
Gravelle v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and the similar case of Farha V. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Pa. 2008); United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
You are responsible for marking your own attendance. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The UK Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative earlier this week in its judgment in R v M & Ors [2017] UKSC 58.Issued in the context of an interlocutory appeal in criminal proceedings, this ruling concerned the proper construction of section 92(1) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:01 pm
" This reasoning is faulty and is also against settled Indian precedents and the international position.On another related note, administration of justice in the State of Tamil Nadu has not been upto the mark. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
The case, Ag Spectrum v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
Counting to 5 (podcast) features “the second part of a two part look at the Court’s unanimous June 19th decision in Matal v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:05 am
In The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:45 pm
Discrimination/Retaliation*Coyle v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 10:24 am
Fake News * NY Times: From Headline to Photograph, a Fake News Masterpiece * Data and Society: Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online * Wired: Inside the Macedonian Fake-News Complex * Mark Verstraete, Derek E. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:51 am
USA v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
And as the Supreme Court held the 1983 case Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:46 am
In Georgetown Rail Equipment v. [read post]
