Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 7481 - 7500 of 13,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am by Matthew Lanahan
United States, scheduled for consideration at today’s Conference. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:59 pm by Mary Dwyer
Quinn11-681Issue: (1) Whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a private organization as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs; and (2) whether the lower court erred in holding that the claims of providers in the Home Based Support Services Program are not… [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:20 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  On May 17, the Solicitor General, having been invited to do so by the court, filed a brief expressing the views of the United States on whether the court should grant the petition for certiorari. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:07 am by Cicely Wilson
Lancaster, United States Supreme Court (5/20/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawIn 1993, Lancaster, a former police officer with a long history of severe mental-health problems, killed his girlfriend. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling,  continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for  satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice  system with it. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling,  continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for  satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice  system with it. [read post]
25 May 2013, 6:59 am by Schachtman
Harkonen’s petition for rehearing in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  For a state defending against a habeas petition, it appears that the only operative rule is Heads I win, tails you lose. [read post]
21 May 2013, 6:11 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]