Search for: "President v. State"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 21,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Skouris, President, K. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
[Jackson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
Carr, Reynolds v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 1:17 pm
In the article, Jeff Kirkpatrick, a past president of the Michigan Court Officer Deputy Sheriff and Process Servers Association, stated that while the vast majority of process servers and court officers follow the law, a few "bad apples" sometimes utilize overreaching tactics.In the near future, it will become an industry standard for court officers and process servers to utilize GPS tracking records to verify their movements relative to an attempted service. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm
Lane v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 3:52 pm
Reuters is reporting that Ned Price, a spokesman from the President’s National Security Council, has unequivocally stated: If Section 215 sunsets, we will not continue the bulk telephony metadata program. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The rare en banc vote was 7-5.The case is Francis v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 2:57 pm
” Sharkey v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
Law Webinars - September 2023 Join Us for Constitution Day 2023 - Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:41 am
" In Richardson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:44 pm
On December 30, the Supreme Court filed its opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm
Today is the 70th anniversary of West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:55 am
President Donald Trump has issued an executive order that, if implemented, would expand crime-based removals. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:19 am
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:43 pm
In 2008, the court held in Vaden v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:28 pm
"* The decision indicates that DOI was investigating the content of Parkhouse's statement at the hearing, alleged to constitute an “inaccurate reading of the Borough President's letter,” and quoting from Herbert v Lando, 441 US 153, states that the “spreading false information in and of itself carries no First Amendment credentials … as there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact…. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 3:10 am
Arbitrator’s award must be confirmed if not completely irrationalMatter of Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 38 AD3d 1152Supreme Court, Monroe County, Judge William P. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:55 pm
Scullin's decision in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:09 am
That decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
