Search for: "SMITH v. SMITH"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 14,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2008, 12:55 am
(Hodge), 224 A.D.2d 770,636 N.Y.S.2d 946) and that the step-daughter of the policy holder was an insured (see, Smith v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:55 pm
Squibb & Sons, 697 So.2d 825, 826 (Fla. 1997) (quoting Smith v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:07 am
Briefly: In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Sproat in Covelli v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
In contrast, presiding over Smith v Obama, U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
’” Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:04 am
" Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
United States, 09-10246 (held since 9/27/10 for Freeman) Smith v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Attorney Jordan Foster, of Tacoma’s Smith Alling, contacted me shortly after I published our article on Gray v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:21 am
The Court also took four three new cases today: It granted two new petitions for review — Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:26 am
The panel decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:11 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (2019), or Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:55 am
Here are the cases that the court will likely look to for guidance in determining if $1,500,000 was a reasonable sum for Alexander's pain and suffering: Urbina v. 26 Court Street Associates LLC : $2,200,000 ($700,000 past - 7 years, $1,500,000 future - 41 years) for a 31 year old man who fell and sustained an intra-articular patella fracture and a torn meniscus requiring three surgeries leaving him with a permanent limp [Urbina case discussed here] Smith v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:39 am
Luquette v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
Smith; concurrence by Fisher with B. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:26 am
In 2014, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:34 am
Smith, 2011 Ill. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a breach of… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:03 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Feldman v. [read post]
