Search for: "Sands" Results 7481 - 7500 of 8,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
The Principles help draw a line in the sand between how the U.S. functions currently and what health care could look like if people were prioritized over profit, if transparency and accountability were strengthened, and if fundamental human rights were upheld through the enforcement of minimum essential standards for well-being. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm by Michael Markarian
(Jack) Kibbie 712.852.4140Paul McKinley 641.774.5784Amanda Ragan 641.424.0874Tom Rielly 641.673.5878Roby Smith 563.386.0179Steven Sodders 641.483.2383Kent Sorenson 515.962.2192Jack Whitver 515.865.6394Mary Jo Wilhelm 563.547.4156 Senators Voting "No" on Dove Hunting: Daryl Beall 515.573.7889 Joe Bolkcom 319.337.6280 Swati Dandekar 319.377.2087 Jeff Danielson 319.231.7192 William Dotzler 319.296.2947 Robert… [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm by Amy Howe
 There are two questions at issue in the case: whether the minerals council could appeal a decision against the United States in a lawsuit that the government had filed; and whether Osage Wind engaged in “mining” – for which it needed a mineral lease – when it removed soil, sand and rock to build cement foundations for wind turbines. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
This is not legal advice, and he welcomes any comments or criticisms: ben.roxborough@gmail.com To say that the sands have been shifting with respect to Section 101 jurisprudence would severely understate the seismic change that it has experienced in recent years; ever more so in recent months. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:53 am by Andy Wright
Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions 8.01 (“When fraudulent intent is an element of the crime, the prosecution has the burden of proving such intent beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But consider the discussion as referring to the metaphorical frog—a creature much like the metaphorical ostrich, which (unlike a real ostrich) does bury its head in the sand when danger looms, and which is thus far more useful to us than a real ostrich could ever be.} [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by John Elwood
Seminole Rock & Sand Co. and Auer v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:25 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you’re not the toes in the sand type, summer can be a great time to pick up a little bit of extra cash with a side gig. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
I’m delighted to present our 15th annual list of the past year’s ten most significant business divorce cases. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:51 am by Sareta Ashraph
The crimes of the Assad government are written in stone, not sand – they cannot be erased either by the passage of time or the unpredictable tides of political expediency. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm by Schachtman
Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Karen Hoffman Lent and Kenneth Schwartz
FTC Commissioner Noah Phillips criticized the suspension of early termination as an effort to “throw sand in the gears” of many proposed mergers. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm by resistance
Now is the time to lift our nation from the quick sands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by John McFarland
” He concludes that, under this language, “if the City chooses to drill those wells where native grass grows on sand dunes, the deed expressly grants the City that right. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am by INFORRM
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:50 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Frankly, I doubt such an offer would ever work unless the evidence against the defendant was overwhelming and a guilty plea was a foregone conclusion — the most the teacher gets is an opportunity to protect her assets from a lawsuit, while at the same time she confesses to child molestation, ruining her future — and I’m not surprised that Norm told the student’s lawyers to go pound sand. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
, Judith Rauhofer, University of Edinburgh – School of Law, SSRN Lawyers and the First Amendment: Conflicts between Former Clients and Personal Speech , 83 University of Cincinnati Law Review 73 (2014), Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2015-16, Sande Buhai, SSRN. [read post]