Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 7481 - 7500 of 16,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am by SHG
In a delightfully titled post that gets the joke backwards,* Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered [sic],  Judge Richard Kopf poses the question that arose in the Third Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am by Amy Howe
United States, the “rails to trails” case. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
But calls to commit a specific crime are generally not constitutionally protected, see United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected each of these theories, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety as a matter of law this past week in Dimond, et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, retired Justice John Paul Stevens argues that “[o]verturning [the Supreme Court’s] decision [in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am by New Books Script
New York : Columbia University Press, 2012 288 p. : ill. ; 24 cm. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:41 am by Madelaine Lane
”  New York v Ferber, 458 US 747, 757-758; 102 S Ct 3348; 73 L Ed 2d 1113 (1982). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by SHG
Wade, decided in 1973, was a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Amicus brief of the Brennan Center for Justice Amicus brief of Walter Dellinger and James Sample Amicus brief of New York et al. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
When a unit member retired in 2003, the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System excluded a part of the payments made to the individual for working scheduled vacation days in determining the member's final average salary. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm by Christine Dowling
Disparity in Federal Sentencing:  Boston Globe staff writer Jonathan Saltzman has this article on a recent study of the widened disparity in federal sentences in light of the case United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The PATA states that New York law governs the interpretation of its terms, J.A. 219, and under that law we review the District Court’s interpretation of the PATA de novo, Dreisinger v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 10:01 pm by Doug Austin
This is the eighth of the 2018 Legaltech New York (LTNY) Thought Leader Interview series. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:07 am by tom
UNITED STATES 09-11556    TOLENTINO, JOSE v. [read post]