Search for: "Waite v. Waite" Results 7481 - 7500 of 15,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2014, 8:41 am
 He also discussed, among other topics, the recent Oracle v M-Tech litigation, in which the defendants raised a competition-based defence which, the Court of Appeal had said, would be sufficient ground on which to refuse an application for interim injunctive relief. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:29 am
 This Kat however reminds readers that he was all in favour of the American football team changing its name, irrespective of whether the name was disparaging or not, on the basis that a substantial and increasing number of people think it is disparaging -- and it's better to rebrand while the going is good than to wait and watch while a once-valuable brand becomes increasingly toxic. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am by ernst
  Registration for each event is in the links below:Seminar 1: Art, Law and Social Justice (Thursday 26 May 3:00-6:30 pm BST)Pierangelo Blandino (University of Lapland)Through a Legal Lens: Law, History, and Visual CultureElena Cooper (University of Glasgow)Art, Copyright and Justice in the Nineteenth Century: Connecting Abraham Solomon’s ‘Waiting for the Verdict’ and ‘Not Guilty’ (1857) to Graves’ Case (1869)Marcus V. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our preview of the civil cases on the Illinois Supreme Court's November oral argument docket continues with Poris v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm by JB
Josh Blackman, James Phillips, and John Yoo argue that a federal mandate to wear masks to prevent the spread of coronavirus would be unconstitutional under NFIB v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 1:25 am by Apolone Gentles
Joseph’s at Fleming Long-Term Care Facility v Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 2280, 2015 CanLII 2811 (ON LA)  … [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:06 pm by David Markus
And in Florida, you have to wait a couple days when you get your permit. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(They appear to be applying the same standard that's presently required under CCP 18.21 Sec. 14 for the sort of "mobile tracking devices" that SCOTUS addressed in US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Rick Pildes
  That is one of the more intriguing questions spawned by yesterday's decision in the child pornography case, Paroline v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:03 am by John Jascob
The plaintiff’s decision to wait until after a related action failed in Minnesota before bringing suit in “a rather leisurely fashion” in Delaware was unreasonable and caused the defendants prejudice in defending the suit and pursuing indemnification rights (Houseman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]