Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 16,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
(See McElduff v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:04 am
” It also did not “cross the line” with regard to its geographic reach, covering only those regions where the employee “operated” as an employee. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:10 am
In cross-examination, Teva's expert conceded that trying to find a solution for the incompatibility of the two active ingredients required a lot of work. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
As Probationer was an at-will employee, whose employment could be terminated at any time during the probationary period, the Appellate Division said that “there can be no action alleging breach of contract, citing Havilland v Yonkers Public Schools, 21 AD3d 527.In addition, the court commented that the amended complaint failed to establish that the Probationer reasonably relied upon the district defendants' alleged misrepresentations, which is an element necessary to the recovery… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
” Judge Rakoff also rejected the argument that the allegedly misleading statements about the company’s business and management were mere “opinion” or “puffery,” stating that “where (as here alleged) the statements were made repeatedly in an effort to reassure the investing public about the Company’s integrity, a reasonable investor could rely on them as reflective of the true state of affairs at the company. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
Danielle Orr, as Administrator of the Estate of Daniel Orr, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Crossing the halfway mark is a big development. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:24 pm
However, there is a line that some companies cross. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:15 am
Canons Regular of the Order of the Holy Cross and (full text) in Doe 51 v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Sierra Club, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:56 am
In response, Husband cross-moved for a reduction in alimony. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Remarkably, the Court has only focused on this substantive question at all in one case, Burns v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:33 pm
Some of our most powerful politicians may well have crossed it. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:19 am
The judge gave a withering critique of the government’s argument that the terms of the original Flores v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:10 am
<> EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:45 am
The state supreme court affirmed in part, finding district court had erred in barring cross-examination of the doctor on this point. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Case citation: Milo & Gabby, LLC v. [read post]
