Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 7501 - 7520 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 6:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Elec.Sign Co., 69 F.3d 512, 517 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:38 pm by Bloomberg
Ford’s F-250 and F-350 Super Duty diesel pickups, a slice of the top-selling F-Series, are spewing emissions as much ... [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm by Lara Fowler
” Discussion circled back to drought compared to non-drought periods, with Ginsburg stating that “[i]f the water is eventually going to get to Florida, that will help Florida. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:30 am by Liisa Speaker
[I]f there were problems that I could not fix in the home then I’ll pull you out of the home. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:25 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  Following deadlines for Plaintiffs to file any reply in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction and any responses to amicus curiae briefs in support of Defendants, a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion will be held on February 20, 2018. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:41 pm by Ralph L. Jacobson
Berwick,  Note particularly at page 8 of the Labor Commissioner’s Order there, the conclusion finding that there was indeed a right to control on the part of the ride-sharing platform over its driver because: “By obtaining the clients in need of the service and providing the workers to conduct it, Defendants retained all necessary control over the operation as a whole. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:22 pm by David Wright
We highlighted the Chief Justice’s cautionary comments about this practice – under which third parties, not class members, are compensated by defendants. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:22 pm by David Wright
We highlighted the Chief Justice’s cautionary comments about this practice – under which third parties, not class members, are compensated by defendants. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:22 pm by David Wright
We highlighted the Chief Justice’s cautionary comments about this practice – under which third parties, not class members, are compensated by defendants. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 9:05 am by Jeff Welty
Olivares, 843 F.3d 752 (8th Cir. 2016) (defendant “requested all of the text messages exchanged between [an officer] and his confidential informant [but the] government was unable to produce the text messages because it failed to download or save them”; defendant argued on appeal that this constituted bad faith destruction of potentially exculpatory evidence; absent evidence of bad faith, the reviewing court rejected the argument; however, the court stated that… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In a footnote, the court of appeals distinguished the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Harris, 839 F.3d 823, cert. granted, No. 16-1140 (U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:24 pm by Steve Kalar
How to Use: Wells is a welcome limitation on that dangerously mushy “inextricably intertwined” FRE 404(b) theory used to smuggle in a defendant’s prior bad acts. [read post]