Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 11:29 am
"I had to learn how not only to find the relevant statutes or code provisions, but I had to find them in English. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:00 am
” Orr, 440 U.S. at 280, 99 S.Ct. at 1112, quoting Stanton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:02 pm
Hernández v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 1:22 am
In Case C-334/05 P OHIM v Shaker di L. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:01 am
In Perry v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
The Glaxo case before the Federal Court of Appeal in turn cited the English House of Lords decision in Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:47 am
A single judge of the Calcutta High Court held in Gemini Silk Limited v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:55 am
Senehi v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:05 pm
In a 2001 Appellate Division case, State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
The CourtMinority Language Education for Majority Students: CS Francophone du Yukon v Yukon Territory On 26 June 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) agreed to hear an appeal of Commission Scolaire Francophone du Yukon v Attorney General of the Yukon Territory, 2014 YKCA 4 [CS Francophone]. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 5:13 am
See General Electric Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 3:15 am
https://t.co/1n8skAdfS1 2018-04-29 Email contract formed where acceptance is received Murray Market Development Inc. v Casa Cubana, 2018 BCSC 565 https://t.co/cJaMLEU63o 2018-04-29 Kodi shutdown fears – Court case could kill this popular add-on service https://t.co/xoLlmjxl20 2018-04-29 OPINION: Liberals should right copyright wrongs https://t.co/hJ76Ngq8Ha 2018-04-29 Sign-Up Buttons Alone Don’t Bind Users to Sign-In-Wraps https://t.co/C4BML28nfl 2018-04-29 Update on South… [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:44 am
That's Systems Division Inc v Teknek Holdings Ltd and others [2007] CSOH 85. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm
Stone Cellars v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
for claims against its subsidiary – sometimes with success, sometimes not: For example, in Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor, the English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, by its Technology and Construction Court, decided that it had no international jurisdiction to hear claims in tort against the Nigerian subsidiary (SPDC) of Royal Dutch Shell (RDC) in connection with environmental and health damages due to oil pollution in the context of the… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
But Virginia v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
