Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 8,589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 8:42 am
In 1986, Washington Cardinal James Hickey attacked the Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
Arizona and Minnick v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:17 pm
Chavez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:05 am
Kell from the Department of Justice (December 21, 2006) in Biovail Corporation. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:12 pm
Because of numerous Supreme Court decisions, including the 6-3 decision in 2005, in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
Arizona v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 8:36 am
So… two lessons, perhaps: 1). stay well away from the Rocky Mountain Bank; 2). keep worrying about laying up treasure in the cloud. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 1:46 am
iStock_000000355220_L1.jpg In a Title VII sex discrimination employment suit, the plaintiff's opinion testimony on her estimated lost earnings and pension benefits should not have been admitted as lay opinion testimony under FRE 701, nor as expert testimony under FRE 702, in Donlin v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:07 pm
Nor, applying the five factors outlined in Frito-Lay, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:55 pm
In it, he claims Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
This is a stub posting on this morning’s Bell decision from the Supreme Court (with the headnote) until we can figure out what its implications are: Bell Canada v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
In one sense, the problem here lay with mapping the “risk-based” approach of MAPPA onto an allocations scheme (an interesting risk v need dichotomy). [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:08 am
In Francis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:44 pm
In today’s case (Mar v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
The case lay dormant for 15 years, before she was summoned for resentencing. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:13 am
Section 2 lays out the classes of persons subjected to this Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:36 am
iStock_000000130176.jpg In child pornography prosecution, detective's lay or expert testimony that images on the defendant's computer media satisfied the legal definition of child pornography was not helpful to the jury since it was only a "bare conclusion"; however its admission was not plain error based on the defense concession in closing argument that the photos were pornographic and that the defense only denied producing the photos, in United… [read post]
