Search for: "R. B."
Results 7521 - 7540
of 55,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 7:02 am
Judgment In September 2017, the Judge of the Civil Court of First Instance No. 20 issued final judgement in favour of the trademark owners ordering the defendants D.S.A. and C.C. to: “a) Cease in the use of individualized brands and/or trade dress and cease the commercialization of the products in the present form of presentation. b) Pay damages caused to the claimant company”. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:00 am
Sources: SEC Order Against Corinthian Capital Group, LLC, Peter B. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:43 pm
Further investigation of several B&B sites reveal that the house has been a fully functioning B&B with 100s of reviews, for a period spanning the entire two-year tenancy. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:00 pm
Le brevet avait pour objet une source lumineuse pour produire de la lumière blanche (A), comprenant une LED bleue (B) et au moins un luminophore absorbant une partie du bleu (C) et émettant dans le jaune-vert, le jaune ou l'orange (E,F), le luminophore étant en [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
And, more to the point, the federal court lawsuit alleges violations of Section 10(b) and 20 of the ’34 Act; it does not allege violations of the ’33 Act. [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
And, more to the point, the federal court lawsuit alleges violations of Section 10(b) and 20 of the ’34 Act; it does not allege violations of the ’33 Act. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am
:”Applying R. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 3:55 am
Cependant, le test demeure que l’ordonnance de non-publication doit être nécessaire afin d’écarter un risque sérieux pour la bonne administration de la justice, vu l’absence d’autres mesures raisonnables pouvant écarter ce risque, et que ses effets bénéfiques doivent être plus importants que ses effets préjudiciables sur les droits et les intérêts des parties et du public. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
See Robert B. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:40 pm
In this case, the defendant was charged with, in part, unlawful disclosure of an intimate image in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 10-177 [b][1]. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:40 pm
In this case, the defendant was charged with, in part, unlawful disclosure of an intimate image in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 10-177 [b][1]. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Gerald Godoy v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 10:49 am
Working sessions Q and R. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
De Lucia established, and Castillo did not dispute, that De Lucia had custody rights under Italian law, that he was exercising those rights at the time of the removal, and that Castillo’s removal of the children to the United States violated De Lucia’s custody rights.Under Italian Civil Code Article 316, “[b]oth parents are entitled with parental responsibility and they shall exercise it by mutual agreement. [read post]
10 May 2019, 8:53 am
June 27, 2017 (two business days later) – Sprint filed a R.60(b) motion for Relief from Judgment based upon the Federal Circuit’s binding authority “that the patent claims underlying that judgment are invalid as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:57 am
In re Arkive Information Management LLC, Serial No. 87487874 (May 8, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
R. 1:36-3. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:05 am
Under the guidance, Title VII requirements would not be triggered merely because U.S. personnel provide “market color” – in the form of certain background information regarding pricing and market conditions and trends – so long as those U.S. personnel do not receive transaction-based compensation or exercise client responsibility in connection with those transactions.The Commission also has proposed two alternative exceptions from the requirement in Exchange Act Rule… [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:00 am
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b) CAFC Affirms TTAB's Shinnecock Smoke Shop Section 2(a) Ruling Would You Have Appealed from this TTAB Trifusal? [read post]
10 May 2019, 5:00 am
Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule (b) [T]he firm may not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter . . . unless: (1) the disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom; and (2) written notice is promptly given to the appropriate client to enable it to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this rule. [read post]
