Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7521 - 7540 of 9,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:02 am by zshapiro
The District Court for the State of Arizona declared a judicial emergency and suspended statutory deadlines for starting criminal trials due to the heavy caseload and the lack of a full roster of judges. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The Hughes court first affirmed the throwing out all of the plaintiff’s standard product liability claims (manufacturing, design, and warnings). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
.); and (v) Art & Science – the many ways of epistemic insights.He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways in teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The Second Judicial District Court in Bernalillo County, New Mexico.What did the complaint allege? [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:18 am by Paul D. Swanson
 In light of the foregoing, the Court cannot see how it may adjudicate this case without disturbing the congressionally approved balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:11 pm by David Ettinger
In “A Second Crack at Prop. 8” in last Wednesday’s Daily Journal [subscription required], Second District Court of Appeal senior judicial attorney Phil Goar has written a thoughtful article about California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, which allows various non-California-state courts to ask the California Supreme Court to answer questions of California law. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Brunswick Corporation (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Formation of company to prosecute false marking claims does not manipulate venue: Texas Data v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm by cdw
“[D]ocuments prepared by court personnel in connection with court cases and maintained by the court are judicial documents governed by GR 15. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  The Court’s second round of review of the case, in Stern v. [read post]