Search for: "Young v. State" Results 7521 - 7540 of 8,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 7:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
., People v Freeland, 36 NY2d 518, 525 [1975].) [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:03 am by Kashmir Hill
Like the Supreme Court sometimes does, at least in Maryland v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:22 am by WSLL
Young, JudgeRepresenting Appellants in Case No. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Gene Quinn
  Could it be true that young patent attorneys and patent agents don’t even know what a “record player” is? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am by Christine Sellers
As is frequently the case in Victorian novels, the new true heir to the Transome estate is a beautiful young woman, Esther Lyon. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
The problem with the standard that was applied is that it comes from a case, Wisiewski v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:25 am by John Culhane
v=yMLZO-sObzQ There’s also a pretty good play, and more parties than you can shake a groove thing at! [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:34 am by Keith Whittington
It is a myth that Chief Justice John Marshall invented, created or established the power of judicial review in his 1803 opinion in the case of Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
His pioneering contrarianism made it acceptable to believe that the Court should side with liberty against encroachments by both state and federal government. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
 However, when considering the effect of a parody, he held that it is a common understanding that a parody must have a somehow humorous effect, and that it is left to (seemingly the courts) Member States to define what is humorous, also depending on different national sensitivities. [read post]