Search for: "ADOPTION OF S E" Results 7541 - 7560 of 15,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2022, 3:50 am by Patrick McKenna
Interestingly, there is a pronounced trend toward firms adopting a shared leadership model, with perhaps the most recent example being the elite litigation firm of Quinn Emanuel. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm by WIMS
Unless we adopt the most cost effective way of reducing carbon emissions, other states will not follow us. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:11 am by Susan Schneider
A native of Pittsburgh, Penn., Vilsack was born into an orphanage and adopted in 1951. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on James E. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 8:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fourth, one BBB complaint was submitted using the name and e-mail address of a person working at StoneCoat, and the founder had access to that person’s laptop. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 12:11 pm by Susan Landau
The bureau needs to adopt its investigative capabilities to the world that has evolved over the last two decades. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
Motive matters in M&A litigation, too, according to UCLA law professor Stephen Bainbridge in his e-book, Directors as Auctioneers—A Concise Guide to Revlon-Land.[1] This notion is not unique to Bainbridge, as Chancellor Leo E. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm by K&L Gates
  In In re Global Crossing, Ltd., the bankruptcy court developed a four-part test to “measure the employee’s expectation of privacy in his computer files and e-mail”: (1) does the corporation maintain a policy banning personal or other objectionable use, (2) does the company monitor the use of the employee's computer or e-mail, (3) do third parties have a right of access to the computer or e-mails, and (4) did the corporation… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:00 am
I would like to be removed from the Committee's mailing list. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
In other words, if there’s no Rosetta Stone to help decipher the parties’ intent, the court will decide the matter for the parties New York courts have adopted one rule of contract interpretation that favors large entertainment companies. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
In other words, if there’s no Rosetta Stone to help decipher the parties’ intent, the court will decide the matter for the parties New York courts have adopted one rule of contract interpretation that favors large entertainment companies. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 8:04 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Further, it noted that although, “[t]hose who adopted the Civil Rights Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result . . . the limits of the drafters’ imagination supply no reason to ignore the law’s demands. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:30 am by David M. McLain
If you would like a copy of the order discussed in this entry, please send me an e-mail at mclain@hhmrlaw.com. [read post]