Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 15,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
But last week, as you’ve probably heard, Elon Musk did not get the outcome he was hoping for in the Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Cook v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 6:08 am
McCumons v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:57 am
Duties of the position assigned to employees in a different negotiating unit following the abolishment of the positionCSEA Orange County Local 836 v PERB, 273 A.D.2d 626The Local 836 case concerns an employee organization’s right to negotiate the impact of a legislative body’s eliminating a certain position and the duties previously performed by incumbent of the abolished position are to be performed by an employee in another collective bargaining unit.On December 31, 1994, the… [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:30 am
In Trezziova v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Webinar Listen to Justin Bates discuss the case in conversation with Tessa Shepperson of Landlord Law in our webinar on Wednesday 24 June 2020 at 10.30 am. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
Even high-stakes corporate business v. business cases before federal trial courts or arbitrations panels abroad will lead your staff to an American Legion hall, a local official, a fire chief, or a beat reporter for a small newspaper. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm
From Weisenbach v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Last week, in EEOC. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 11:27 am
In fact, you might remember the case of Eagle v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:39 am
It is a tough call in the facts that were before the First Department yesterday in Marmelstein v Kehillat New Hempstead: Rav Aron Jofen Community Synagogue, 2007 NY Slip Op 06504. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:07 am
” Conversely, Justice Neil Gorsuch found most relevant the statutory requirement that dual technicians must be members of the National Guard. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
(e) Mr Fountain had had an earlier telephone conversation regarding the eviction, in April, with Kate Bukrashvilli. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:38 am
The “substantial evidence” standard applies in administrative hearings; the "arbitrary and capricious" test governs in contract disciplinary actions Matter of Edwards v Oyster Bay-East Norwich Cent. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:16 pm
Conversely, the statements that Mr. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:02 am
Case Name: Stone v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:51 am
(Courtesy of Center for Medical Progress) From yesterday’s order in National Abortion Federation v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:32 pm
Going Deeper: Specifically, a case captioned McMillon v. [read post]
