Search for: "California v. Law" Results 7541 - 7560 of 33,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
AB 5: Employee Classification As previously reported, in April 2018 the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Capitol Hill House Democrats’ “Leading Infrastructure for Tomorrow’s America Act” (LIFT America Act) –containing $40 billion dedicated for broadband, largely through reverse auctions – remains pending. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The California Supreme Court’s August 29, 2019 decision in Pitzer College v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm by Nassiri Law
As our Orange County employment attorneys can explain, what this law does is codify last year’s California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:48 am by Harper Batts and Chris Ponder
  In GoPro, Inc. v. 360Heros, the facts are unusual.[1] GoPro filed a complaint in the Northern District of California pleading trademark and copyright infringement, unfair competition, and sought a declaratory judgment that it did not infringe the patent at issue. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:45 am by Liz Dunshee
The 8-K says that the company took this step to implement the requirements of SB 826, the California law that requires female representation on boards. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am by Gordon Ahl
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Jason Kelley
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am by Melissa Crow
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]