Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 7541 - 7560 of 13,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 12:30 am
Did you complete Worksheet 1-1 on page 4 of the instructions? [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Holmes (2014) Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol.25, No. 1, SSRN “Who Pays the Price? [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:32 pm
Unless the instrument indicates otherwise (decedent's will does not), issue are the descendants in any degree from a common ancestor. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm
Unless the instrument indicates otherwise (decedent's will does not), issue are the descendants in any degree from a common ancestor. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
(See R. 25–1 at 6 ¶ 22 -- `It can't be confirmed if the software has access to, or writes information in other non-shared areas of the remote client. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
., on the basis that its Community trade mark (CTM) applications were devoid of distinctive character according to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:55 am by Doorey
January 29, 2015 The Most Famous Dissent in Canadian Labour Law History Revisited On the eve of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Saskatchewan v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:44 am by randywallace
  That is exactly what an Attorney General’s opinion does in Mississippi. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
But how does this practical guidance relate to the way we might conceive of an ethical duty to use technology competently? [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:38 pm by Cody Poplin
— (1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
Strohmeyer (Porter Hedges LLP) recently published an article entitled, Split-Interest Charitable Trusts, 29 Probate & Property No. 1 (January/February 2015). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:37 am
 These are the 7 questions that in the AG’s opinion the Dutch Supreme Court should refer to the CJEU:1Does it constitute a “communication to the public” in the sense of Art 3(1) of Directive 2001/29, when a person -who is not the copyright holder- makes available a work -which was placed without the consent of the copyright holder by a third person an a website- on his own website through a hyperlink (in other words: in the case… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Complete text of bill is below, but here are the bullet points:Conditions covered - Cancer, AIDS or Parkinson's DiseasePhysician certifies its use.Potency "the specific concentrations of individual cannabinoids that must be present to treat the patient's condition," Limited to a 30-day supply.Dispensaries  approved by county commissionFlorida Medical Marijuana - Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawFlorida Senate - 2015 SB 528By Senator… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:23 am by Jani
In the absence of a judgment in English (which this writer was waiting for) the information conveyed in this post has been parsed from several sources; however hopefully represents an accurate reading of the case.The question posed to the Court was simple: "Does the embedding, within one’s own website, of another person’s work made available to the public on a third-party website... constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of… [read post]