Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 7541 - 7560 of 9,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2011, 11:12 am by sandylaw
Failure to file information returns like Form 3520 Report of Foreign Gift or Bequest carry penalties of up to 35% of the value of the gift or bequest. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:23 am by Bernie Burk
  (You can see more discussion of this issue in Scott’s article at pages 35-36, and in a paper of mine at pages 555-59.) [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
In an amicus brief filed by the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) and The Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) set out this familiar position in an amicus brief of their own, stating: Isolated DNA molecules are unquestionably “composition[s] of matter,” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
“[c]ombining, comparing or matching personal data obtained from multiple sources”) but does not include any express exemption for small-scale processing. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by Stu Ellis
  It does not take a large fan to cool the grain. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:00 pm by Jason Rantanen
Cir. 2013) Download 12-1428.Opinion.5-16-2013.1Panel: Newman (dissenting), Bryson (author), O'Malley Although decided under the "old" version of 35 U.S.C. 102, Dey v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:37 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:25 am by Liam Thornton
.” Hussein v The Labour Court & Anor [2012] IEHC 364 (31 August 2012) at para. 1 (Mr. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:15 pm by Lisa R. Pruitt
 Here's the county-to-county comparison on a range of agricultural data points, from the Atlas of Rural and Small-Town America:Principal Operator 10 years or more on same parcel:  San Miguel County, 87; Newton County,  439Principal Operator 2 years or less on same parcel:  San Miguel County, 1; Newton County, 35. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:42 pm
  The court noted that while violation of the regulation does “not constitute negligence per se [It] simply creates an expanded duty of care for the operation of commercial motor vehicles under the conditions stated therein. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 9:49 pm
In our view this offence does pass the custody threshold and cannot be properly dealt with by any lesser penalty. [read post]