Search for: "English v. English" Results 7541 - 7560 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Henry Oliver
In W (Algeria) (FC) and BB (Algeria) (FC) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 – read judgment  The Supreme Court has made a difficult decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm by Shafik Bhalloo
The Canadian, New Zealand[1] and English[2] courts shortly followed suit. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm by Shafik Bhalloo
The Canadian, New Zealand[1] and English[2] courts shortly followed suit. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The program of harmonization and unification of conflicts of laws (“Rome I”–“Rome V” and more) obliges to describe the scope of each regulation. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm by Daithí
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb - but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:58 am
Secondly Wimmer wanted to engage an English cameraman so he approached Chris Riley of Wide Eyed Entertainment Ltd. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
HT to Pietro Franzina for a pointer to the case of the day, Negrepontis-Giannisis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
To translate this into human English: under the law, DOC must address double counting where (i) it has been demonstrated by a foreign exporter (according to the bill's summary) that the subsidies at issue have lowered its U.S. import prices; and (ii) DOC has determined that it can "reasonably estimate" the extent to which those subsidies have affected the anti-dumping duty on the same imports. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:27 am by Rosalind English
Applying the Strasbourg Court’s ruling in Agrokompleks v Ukraine  (23465/03), October 6, 2011, it was clear that both the previous Ukrainian judgment in the respondent’s favour and the English judgment were “possessions” protected by the Protocol, requiring the English court to recognise the continued existence of the debt. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Athon… The 9th District upholds the trial court’s excluding a Puerto Rican for cause from a jury panel where he said he had difficulty understanding English, and the parties had difficulties understanding him, in State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix Chambers.
On 5 March the Supreme Court hears KAS or H v The Lord Advocate & Anor, BH v The Lord Advocate & Anor. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
 The Shaggy Dog - (1959) (English Sheep Dog) (Tommy Kirk) 23. [read post]