Search for: "John Robert" Results 7541 - 7560 of 20,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Robert MacCoun (Stanford Law School) & Sarah Polcz (Stanford University - John M. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 3:20 am by NCC Staff
It had been proposed in draft form by the Committee of Five (John Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson) and it took two days for the Congress to agree on the edits. 3. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In an interview on ABC radio John Menadue, a former head of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, has called News Corp a “rogue organisation. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 7:17 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
A pesar de que la negación del estado de fondos probablemente llevaría sólo a “unas cuantas rodillas más raspadas”, escribió el juez John Roberts, “la exclusión de Trinity Lutheran de un beneficio público para el cual califica de otra forma, sólo porque es una iglesia, es odiosa para nuestra Constitución de todos modos, y no debe prevalecer. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
It had been proposed in draft form by the Committee of Five (John Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson) and it took two days for the Congress to agree on the edits. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:58 pm
"Here's why US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was in Lancaster this morning": Heather Stauffer of LNP has this report. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:41 pm by Ted Smith
  The document was drafted  by the Committee of Five (John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston.) [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:41 pm by Ted Smith
  The document was drafted  by the Committee of Five (John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston.) [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:09 am by Symone Mazzotta
” In his opinion for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts memorably called it “a gun to the head. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
They sued Attorney General John Ashcroft and others for money damages, under a 1971 precedent allowing victims of constitutional injuries to sue federal agents for such relief. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Roberts Jr. and his former boss and mentor, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Richardson and his next-in-command, Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus, both refused to carry out the president’s order and resigned instead, the acting head of the Department of Justice, Solicitor General Robert Bork, carried out President Nixon’s wishes and fired Mr. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm by Stephen McAllister
Davis, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court leaped multiple, virtually insurmountable procedural obstacles and standards to allow lower courts to reach the merits of a challenge that indisputably raised concerns, though the concerns were created by the defendant’s own lawyer, not by any action of the state or the prosecutors. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by Charles Roth
Assuming that Justice Antonin Scalia was the third vote against Flores-Villar, it seems that at least one justice (presumably either John Roberts or Anthony Kennedy) voted against Flores-Villar but later became convinced either of the unconstitutionality of the statute or of the availability of a remedy in criminal cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:29 am by Richard Samp
Those named as defendants included former attorney general John Ashcroft, former FBI director (and current special counsel) Robert Mueller and former Immigration and Naturalization Services commissioner James Ziglar. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:46 pm by David Bernstein
” MacLean identifies only two such libertarians, Frank Chodorov and and Robert LeFevre. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by Alice O'Brien
Over the objection of Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts limited the sweep of the court’s opinion to the specific facts before it. [read post]