Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 7541 - 7560
of 55,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
For progressives to have any leverage at all in an Article V convention, at least four Republican state legislatures would have to spontaneously surrender the power they have worked so hard, and spent so much money, to amass. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
See NAACP v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:03 am
United States of America v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
The post Senator Sasse on Pluralists v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:13 am
The first case I want to discuss in this vein (and the only case today) is DeGiacomo v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
., N.A. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
Few issues aside from COVID-19 and the Russian incursion into Ukraine exhibit staying power. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
The Court also makes an important observation regarding the High Court’s unjustified encroachment upon the arbitral tribunal’s competence.Interim award and jurisdiction under section 16 – interim award can be challenged separately and independently under section 34, and arbitral tribunal’s authority to rule on its own jurisdiction is restricted and specificM/S Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co-Operative Limited v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:14 pm
One very recent Court decision is a perfect test of these thoughts: the Court's 5-4 decision in Arizona Christian School Tuition v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 9:46 am
” This result, which the court found was foreshowed by an earlier Massachusetts high court decision known as DePianti v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
In Raines v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
This clarifies an aspect of South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 11:47 am
Escobar, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:24 am
In Tyler v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:47 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 5:31 pm
But, in two important ones involving Trump—Trump v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
Whitford, Lewis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm
On appeal, Coleman contends that SORNA, as applied to him, violates the Ex Post Facto Clause and that it constitutes an invalid exercise of Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:25 pm
IVE ALSO SEEN MAGIC AND PSYCHIC POWERS. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 2:44 pm
The fact that a California tribunal wouldn't have the power to change the ownership of the disputed property -- located (again) in Country X -- would seem to lock things down.Our fancy legal name for that is forum non conveniens. [read post]
