Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 7541 - 7560 of 9,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Also to be considered are the related issues of the exclusionary rule and modern developments under the Roberts Court in the law of police interrogation. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:16 pm by Kali Borkoski
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:01 pm
In general, the False Claims Act authorizes private individuals who discover fraud against the United States to sue on its behalf. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:02 am
Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:16 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
They will decide whether the women can join in a class action as the vehicle for their lawsuit.There have been no blockbuster rulings so far like last term's controversial campaign finance decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:36 pm by Steve Bainbridge
United States, 347 U.S. 645, 652-53, 74 S.Ct. 826, 98 L.Ed. 1015 (1954)).... [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kara OBrien
  In the criminal context, DPAs typically involve the government filing a formal charging document, usually an information, as well as the DPA with the appropriate court; NPAs typically do not involve the courts and the agreements are maintained by the parties.[9] Historically, the SEC resolved settled enforcement actions by filing consent judgments based on civil complaints in a United States District Court or an administrative order instituting proceedings and imposing… [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am by James Bickford
  In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the sequels to Citizens United, which are raising “[i]ssues such as how the government may regulate disclosure of spending, and whether bans on direct corporate contributions to candidates” are permissible. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]