Search for: "T. Roberts" Results 7541 - 7560 of 36,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by SHG
Justice Robert Jackson famously told federal prosecutors that their job was to “do justice. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Jonathan Adler observes that “[i]t is certainly possible that the Roberts Court, with what appears to be a firm conservative majority, may be willing to overturn precedents at a rapid clip, but that has not been the Court’s record thus far. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:12 pm by Howard Bashman
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court sides with ‘subversive’ clothing designer in First Amendment case. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
Here, the case at issue was originally brought by Erik Brunetti, an artist and entrepreneur who tried to register “FUCT” as a trademark for his clothing line, which he argued in the litigation is pronounced as four letters (“F-U-C-T”) and stands for “Friends U Can’t Trust. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
Here, the case at issue was originally brought by Erik Brunetti, an artist and entrepreneur who tried to register “FUCT” as a trademark for his clothing line, which he argued in the litigation is pronounced as four letters (“F-U-C-T”) and stands for “Friends U Can’t Trust. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts has an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:52 am by Howard Friedman
The term suggested by that mark is not needed to express any idea and, in fact, as commonly used today, generally signifies nothing except emotion and a severely limited vocabulary.Three separate opinions dissenting in part were filed-- one by Chief Justice Roberts, one by Justice Breyer and one by Justice Sotomayor joined by Justice Breyer. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
There are 3 opinions that concur in part and dissent in part, one by Roberts, one by Breyer, and one by Sotomayor. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:10 am by Rick Pildes
"  That sounds much like his statement in the Gundy dissent that "enforcing the separation of powers isn't about protecting institutional prerogatives or governmental turf. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
[T]he Lanham Act allows registration of marks when their messages accord with, but not when their messages defy, society’s sense of decency or propriety. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As he puts it, “[t]he consequence of an election is that someone is elected. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 5:00 am by eileen peck
Don’t make a determination about your best options until you’ve worked with an experienced federal defense attorney. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Les cas vécus de fraude que nous rapportons ici vous feront certainement réfléchir… Canadian Legal History BlogKelm and Smith, Talking back to the Indian Act: Critical Readings in Settler Colonial Histories In honour of Indigenous Peoples’ Day today (June 21) the U of T press has compiled a list of relevant publications from their catalog. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[t]he decision was notable for an exchange about the court’s attitude toward precedent. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by Miriam Seifter
The majority opinion in Knick, written by Chief Justice John Roberts on behalf of himself and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, overrules Williamson County. [read post]