Search for: "art@law" Results 7541 - 7560 of 39,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm by Alfred Brophy
 I have some parallel thoughts about this in "Property and Progress: Antebellum Landscape Art and Property Law." [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Vladyslav Lanovoy
’s obligations under Art. 6(2) of the ATT, which in turn implicates the obligation to prevent genocide under Art. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
In the following, the AG also turns to primary law in order to examine whether the term of   “service” used in primary law can be transferred to the Brussels I Regulation (para. 60 et seq.). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:06 am by Kluwer Blogger
The appeal court also refused to find infringement of the Google cache service, despite accepting that it could be exempted neither under the “proxy caching” safe harbor (art.15 LSSICE, ex art.13 e-comm Directive) or under the search engine / links safe harbor (art.17 LSSICE), nor as a temporary copy (art.31.1 TRLPI, ex art.5.1 EUCD). [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:06 am by ALEX BAILIN QC MATRIX
It is very hard indeed to establish that the substantive criminal law violates the ECHR. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:53 am by Eszter Szakács
The Court started by stressing that ”appropriate compensation”, as it appears in Art. 9 (7) of the Directive, is an independent notion of Union Law, requiring uniform interpretation in the EU. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 6:13 am by Florian Mueller
Kircher said that case law and literature were inconclusive as to whether or not a parallel claim could help a court construe another claim. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:50 pm
[T]he adequacy of a particular description is a case-specific conclusion, not an all-purpose rule of law. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[9.4] According to the established case law of the Boards of appeal, the assessment of inventive step is usually carried out in accordance with the methodology provided by the problem-solution approach. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
” Although the primary prior art reference (Hoang) did not disclose the vent limitations, the district court found – as a matter of law on summary judgment – that a person of skill in the art would have recognized the need for a vent to relieve pressure. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 8:16 pm by Donn Zaretsky
  It would violate the Held In Trust Law. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Not surprisingly, the court found that reissuance of the patent precluded a finding of “but for” materiality as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 6:16 am
While Art.15(4) excludes Art.29(2), the impugned Article 15(5) does not exclude Art.29(2). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 11:41 am by Howard Knopf
This could have been an opportunity to apply to the copyright context Justice Rothstein’s lesson from trade-marks law. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:10 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
’” Thus, the PTAB concluded:  Thus, while the claims may be directed to a natural phenomenon or law of nature, on some level, and the prior art might teach or suggest individual steps recited by the appealed claims, the evidence on appeal does not support a conclusion that the claimed steps, as an ordered combination, constitute mere routine and customary actions that do not provide the "something more" than the natural law upon which they may… [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:26 pm
The Advocate General suggests disregarding such practices for purposes of consistency: If marketing is prohibited under regulatory law, these acts should not count as marketing under trade mark law either. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm
Nov. 4, 2013).Issues[1] Rudolph argues that the court erred as a matter of law by concluding that the amendment was not narrowing. [read post]