Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 48,978
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In Gayed v Abdelmalek [2020] VCC 1814 a man has been awarded $120,000 in damages and $85,000 in legal costs after winning a defamation battle against a fellow churchgoer over Facebook posts branding him a scammer. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 12:45 pm
Point Curlew Tenants Association v Francis (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) (2020) UKUT 131 (LC) Invoiced costs of a managing agent in ‘reconciling accounts’ for a First Tier Tribunal hearing on service charges were not recoverable under the service charge where there was a previous Section 20C order for the hearing fo which the reconciliation had been carried out. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 8:15 am
Goddard v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 4:09 pm
The Court additionally granted an injunction preventing any similar publication in the future, and awarded the Claimant’s costs in full, summarily assessed in the sum of £49,297.65. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:18 am
That requires looking not only at benefits to those with disabilities, but also the opportunities for fraud and the likely cost to businesses and others, including others with disabilities. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:30 am
Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
The High Court decided not to make such an order, following the practice described in R (Davies) v Birmingham Deputy Coroner [2004] EWCA Civ 207 (“Davies”): that, if a court or tribunal adopts a neutral stance in proceedings in which its decision is challenged, it will not be liable for the costs of the claim, unless there are exceptional circumstances. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:29 am
The PRA will keep these costs under review and will consider consulting on changes to the fee should there be a material change in costs. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:08 pm
Netty Engler Energy, LP has asked the Texas Supreme Court to review the decision of the Fort Worth Court of Appeals in Netty Engler Energy, LP v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:56 am
Paine Webber v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 7:31 am
Background The law on corporate criminal liability in England and Wales is one of the biggest obstacles to tackling economic crime, which the Treasury estimates costs the UK “tens” if not “hundreds of billions of pounds”[1]. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Both can press anti-migration policies at lower cost than pro-migration policies. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
[UQ v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:29 am
The ability to contain those costs is at the very heart of the viability of most workers’ compensation systems. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
