Search for: "Federal Receiver" Results 7561 - 7580 of 100,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2023, 10:08 am by Thomas James
On Friday, March 24, 2023, a federal district court judge agreed, granting the publishers’ motion for summary judgment. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:19 am by David Oxenford and Robert Primosch
 Comments on the Proposed Rule will be due 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 7:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host a guest contribution by Daria Bohatchuk (University of Basel) on the upcoming Swiss patent reform. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 3:22 pm by Unknown
On or about May 4, 2020, federal law enforcement officials interviewed Byron, and he admitted receiving the October 2017 letter and the $40,000. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Chip Merlin
For example, if an insurance company reduces the amount paid out for a claim to save money, the policyholder may not receive the full amount they need to cover their losses. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[t]he panel decision is an insuperable obstacle to any plaintiff asserting any federal takings claim against any State in federal or state court. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:20 am by Amanda Shanor
The federal government came to the Supreme Court, which in December agreed to weigh in. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:09 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides up to twelve weeks of unpaid leave for certain reasons. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 8:34 am by Ben Vernia
The Anti‑Kickback Statute prohibits soliciting or receiving anything of value in return for the referral of items or services covered by federal health care programs. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 8:28 am by Hepworth Holzer, LLP
Follow your doctor’s orders and attend all recommended follow-up appointments to ensure you receive the care you need. [read post]
The GC’s Memo contains an FAQ in response to inquiries the NLRB has received about the McLaren Macomb decision and outlines Abruzzo’s plans for enforcement of the decision. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:01 am by Berry Law
Federally backed VA home loans are beneficial because they usually have low interest rates and down payment requirements. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 5:25 am by Chip Merlin
‘The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing exists in every contract and requires that none of the parties do anything which will injure the right of another party to receive the benefit of the contract. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
In this case, a company engaged in “the business of providing workforce training, management, compliance, and consulting services” was sold to a Delaware corporation, and its founder received $10,000,000. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Gifts to Trump Family from Foreign Nations Are Missing, Report Says MSN – Jacqueline Alemany and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 3/17/2023 Federal officials cannot find two gifts received by former President Trump and his family from foreign nations, including a life-size painting of Trump from the president of El Salvador and golf clubs from the Japanese prime minister, according to a new report from House Democrats. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:49 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
In March 2023 the Australian Federal Court found that a claim had first been made against a director when an email was sent to his address but allegedly not read by him till much later. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:41 pm by Gregg Hollander
The resident fails to pay for nursing home care after receiving “reasonable and appropriate notice. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
The student, Miguel Luna Perez, and his family first settled a lawsuit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which guarantees disabled children the right to receive a free and appropriate education, but does not allow plaintiffs to receive money as a remedy. [read post]
March 7, 2023). 2 Id. at 4. 3 The plaintiff conceded, however, that the product’s label disclosed PTFE, a PFAS derivative, as an ingredient, and there are no federal or state regulations prohibiting the use of PFAS in cosmetic products. [read post]