Search for: "I v. B" Results 7561 - 7580 of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
§ 1332(d)(11)(B)(i), transforming their cases into a single mass action subject to federal jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 9:22 pm by Nasseri Legal
Sportovní sázková platforma MOSTBET nabízí obrovský výběr sportovních událostí a trhů, agresivní kurzy a široký výběr možností sázení. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
’ [Texas Penal Code]§ 42.07(b)(3). [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 8:53 am by Wystan Ackerman
With respect to the proposal that “issues classes” not require predominance, I suggested that if the committee were to adopt that, they should at a minimum allow district courts to evaluate whether predominance is required, in part by evaluating whether the case or issue belongs under Rule 23(b)(2) or Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]