Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 4:56 am
The court went on to explain that [i]n conducting a review under Article 62(b), UCMJ, of a military judge's decision to exclude matters, this court may act only with respect to matters of law. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:36 am
On or about December 20, 2010, a transfer of approximately $720,000; b. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 5:35 am
It's the busiest time of the legislative season, and in the scheme of things the legislation moving this week in the Texas Legislature on criminal justice matters was pretty positive, I'm happy to report. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
Fitzgerald was a meandering exercise that shed little direct light on how the justices will dispose of this matter. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
I have had a question from the editor of the Small Places blog, which is a very fine blog on human rights and community care, with attention to Court of Protection matters. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:14 pm
App. 867, 870 (1) (b) (717 SE2d 272) (2011). [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:31 am
The U.S. buyer; b. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
I have had a question from the editor of the Small Places blog, which is a very fine blog on human rights and community care, with attention to Court of Protection matters. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:03 pm
Much of the discussion in recent days about the Obama draft AUMF for ISIL contains mistakes and misconceptions, at least as I see matters. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 10:44 am
Woldow and Douglas B. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:03 am
Of course, an exception doesn't have to be labeled as an exception. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:23 am
The statute would only matter for offenses that fail for lack of constitutional power, not offenses that directly abridge constitutional rights. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:04 pm
” Phyllis B. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
§ 1326(b). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:51 pm
Invariably inventors will come and say they have invented X that does A, B and C. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:10 pm
I think Sections II-B-2 and II-C-2 will soon enough become the law. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
In the end, while the claim under Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation 2009 failed, the claim under Article 9(1)(b) succeeded as it didn’t matter that there was no confusion at the point of trade: what was decisive was that there was confusion pre-sale. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm
And as a practical matter, wouldn’t the deployment of these tools introduce a potentially cumbersome, evidentiary-based process at the class certification stage that could be ungainly, time-consuming and costly? [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(As is true in Gerber’s case, Kilborn’s dispute involves claims that go beyond the First Amendment, but for present purposes I focus on the latter.)Gerber’s apparent beef—that a public employer has punished him for his speech on matters of public concern—is not super novel, and the federal courts have a relatively well-established doctrinal framework for dealing with such matters. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
" It doesn't seem to matter whether any given customer actually believed the pitch or not. [read post]