Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 7561 - 7580 of 16,410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
Cornell Law School Dean and prominent property law scholar Eduardo Peñalver’s has posted a thoughtful review of my book The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Infanti, Victims of Our Own Success: The Perils of Obergefell and Windsor, (Ohio State Law Journal Furthermore, Forthcoming).Peter Nicolas, Obergefell's Squandered Potential, (California Law Review Circuit, 2015 Forthcoming). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Motsepe case followed a decision of our Supreme Court of Appeal in 2009 in the State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm by LTA-Editor
Chief Judge Prost wrote a dissenting opinion, stating that the patents at issue cover only minor features of the overall mobile device. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
At the core of the case of Wittman v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The 2009 case of Pape v Commissioner of Taxation by High Court of Australia noted significant limits on this taxation power. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am by Megen Miller
The plaintiff, by his mother as next friend, had sued the minor child defendant Michael Hand, Hand's foster-care provider, the state of Michigan, DHS, and DHS of Wexford-Missaukee Counties. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 11:55 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Waiver of right to jury trial — Failure to preserve for appeal Following a waiver of his right to a trial by jury, Darius Levon Wilmot (“Wilmot”) was convicted at a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Cecil County of sexual abuse of a minor. [read post]
AB 883 would add section 432.6 to the Labor Code to prohibit a state or local agency from discriminating against current or former public employees in publishing job advertisements, in establishing qualifications for job eligibility, and in making adverse employment decisions. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
But this has not stopped some minority shareholders of Delaware close corporations from asserting claims for shareholder oppression under Delaware common law, usually citing a 1992 Chancery Court decision in Litle v Waters, 1992 WL 25758 [Del Ch Feb. [read post]