Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 57,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2008, 11:45 pm
See Dudnikov v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:04 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
In Jones v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 2:21 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in the Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 2:28 pm
You may be thinking this sounds like Buck v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
One outside expert, Joseph V. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice Roberts'… [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 1:54 pm
V. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Judge Pagones said that it is well settled that the failure to maintain a minimum qualification for employment is not an act of misconduct nor one related to job performance that would invoke the disciplinary procedures mandated by Civil Service Law §75, citing Matter of NYS Office of Children and Family Services v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:35 am
As I have said before, when I read these long capital habeas opinions, I cannot help but wish that federal circuit judges would regularly give as much attention to federal drug offenders directly appealing their long imprisonment sentences as they give to state murderers appealing their death sentences. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
With respect to Petitioners' claim the Supreme Court should have granted their motion to remove the matter to federal court, the Appellate Division, citing Geiger v Arctco Enters., Inc., 910 F Supp 130, said "the right of removal is vested exclusively in [respondents and a petitioner] simply may not remove an action from a state court". [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
With respect to Petitioners' claim the Supreme Court should have granted their motion to remove the matter to federal court, the Appellate Division, citing Geiger v Arctco Enters., Inc., 910 F Supp 130, said "the right of removal is vested exclusively in [respondents and a petitioner] simply may not remove an action from a state court". [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Comics, 69 P.3d 473 (Cal. 2003), which states you are free to do so. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 5:02 pm
Yesterday, in Virginia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Police officers knocked on doors to identify those who had been exposed, and the City contacted state and local agencies to help deal with the environmental and public health emergency. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm
" The Recreation Groups stated that the "question framed by the panel should be heard en banc. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
A CAAF grant in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Tettamanti, et al. v. [read post]
