Search for: "Apotex"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
A long time ago - blogwise, anyway - we put together a post that described and linked to all the FDA's amicus curiae briefs that the Agency had filed in favor of preemption in prescription drug and medical device product liability litigation. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Apotex? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Apotex Inc., No. 15-307 Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm
Another new petition includes the BPCIA case Apotex v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
Apotex) (5/21/07)Preemption news (Levine v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Apotex Inc., No. 15-307 Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:41 am
Apotex Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:36 am
Apotex Corp., 316 F.3d 1348 (Fed. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Apotex Inc., No. 15-307 Luv N’ Care, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
-> RT McCarthy Tétrault’s IP litigators win more than $180 million judgment for Merck against Apotex for infringing Merck’s lovastatin patent -> Irish Supreme court dismisses copyright appeal in software infringement case, Koger v O'Donnell [2013] IESC 28 http://t.co/hXZOznIAct -> Japanese government considering copyright term extension http://t.co/5MI5RAuQOH -> What does Canada’s new anti-spam law mean for individuals and businesses? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:05 am
| The 17th draft of UPC Rules of Procedure.Never too late 18 [week ending Sunday 2 November] -- The Limerick Competition results | More on CJEU in BestWater | The GC in Laguiole | France to review its IP Code | Reports on the “no patents round-up for non-techie people” event | Renting an orphan work in the UK | Aldi and look-alikes | The UK Supreme Court in Servier v Apotex | Are patent trolls really a problem? [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 7:34 pm
Apotex Inc., 718 F. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm
Apotex Inc., 687 F.3d 1362, 1369(Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
Apotex, Inc., 480 F.3d 1348, 1364, 1367–68 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
Apotex, 480 F.3d 1348; 2007 U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
Apotex Inc., in which the court reversed a PTAB “obviousness determination because its finding of a reasonable expectation of success was not supported by substantial evidence,” the court stated: In view of Dr. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
. | Changes to the Singapore copyright system: an update on the recent public consultations | he diplomatic crisis of Qatar and Gulf Cooperation Council's IP | Bundesgerichtshof's landmark ruling to hook extra-territorial patent infringement in Germany | BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patent | Monday Miscellany | Sunday SurprisesNever Too Late 154 [week ending Sunday 2 July] I Book Review: Patent… [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The Court dismisses Actavis' cross-appeal on the basis that if its products did not directly infringe, they would indirectly infringe to the extent held by the Court of Appeal.And, of course, the weekly updates Monday Miscellany and Sunday Surprises.Photo credit: rawdonfoxPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 154 [week ending Sunday 2 July] I Book Review: Patent Drawing Rules I German Supreme Court holds that extra-territorial delivery can result in patent infringement I Canadian… [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
Apotex, Inc [here], the Federal Court of Appeal embraced the US/French approach. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
Further, Pfizer's claims as to what consists of evergreening should've taken into account their own experience in Pfizer v Apotex, when a US Fed Cir Court ruled that their claimed advantage of increased solubility and stability were not sufficient 'since it found the claimed advantage (better solubility and stability) to be fairly ordinary and the result of mere routine experimentation.' [read post]
