Search for: "Appeal of Hughes" Results 741 - 760 of 2,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
However, she could pursue failure-to-hire claims under federal and local law, as well as retaliation claims based on allegations she was blacklisted and denied further appearances (Hughes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:53 pm by Shahram Miri
  In a recent unpublished appellate opinion, the California Court of Appeal had to determine which individual the testator was referring to in their will. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 4:02 am by Matthew Kahn
The government appealed to the D.C. circuit, which heard argument on Friday. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
 PatentsInternKat Rose Hughes turns her attention to the topics of claim interpretation and infringement in a recent decision by the UK Court of Appeal: Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 2:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The decision was issued by a panel comprised of Chief Judge Sharon Prost and Circuit Judges Todd Hughes and Kara Stoll. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Mr Gibson sought Judicial Review of the MoJ’s decision but his claim was dismissed at first instance and his appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Treacy and Gloster LJJ [2015] EWCA Civ 1148). [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:06 pm by Danielle D'Onfro
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit would impose additional costs and losses on them, a claim for which NFIB had cited its own report. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:22 am
“Excellences & Perfections” and the saga of Amalia UlmanPatentsInternKat Rose Hughes turns her attention to the topics of claim interpretation and infringement in a recent decision by the UK Court of Appeal: Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 7:51 am by INFORRM
This post originally appeared on the Hugh Stephens Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks © Hugh Stephens 2018. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467, a state-on-top qualified immunity case, holding that Tucson police did not violate clearly established law when they shot a woman who was standing in her yard holding a kitchen knife and who had been reported to be acting erratically. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Hughes, in which the court ruled that a police officer who shot a woman outside her home was immune from suit in a civil-rights case. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said that Hughes could sue Kisela for excessive force under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
On appeal, however, Raytheon disclaimsreliance on those documents. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 11:56 am by Will Baude
Hughes, the latest reversal of a Ninth Circuit opinion that had denied qualified immunity to a police officer. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 10:02 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in favor of Amy Hughes, whom police corporal Andrew Kisela shot and wounded in 2010. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 8:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
Hughes, No. 17-467.In other action, the high court took up yet another question on when a prior conviction counts as "violent" for the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]