Search for: "Argus Energy, LLCĀ " Results 741 - 760 of 898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Trial court's denial of motion to compel arbitration upheld in interlocutory appeal on waiver grounds.Adams v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Acceleron LLC, 587 F.3d 1358, 1361 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:35 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
The trustee moved to dismiss the case arguing that a joint bankruptcy petition could not be filed because they were two males. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The investment advisor to the funds is Janus Capital Management LLC. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:26 am by Eric Schweibenz
Patent No. 7,242,089 (the ‘089 patent) is directed to MEMS packages that allow acoustic energy to contact a transducer while protecting the transducer from light, electromagnetic radiation, and physical damage. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Laurence Ehrhardt, R-North Kingstown, who opposes the Deepwater contract and argued against the long-term contracting law for other reasons said the fair way is to spread the costs out. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:56 pm by Eric Schweibenz
D610,732S (“the ‘732 patent”) and for sanctions against Complainants Duggal Dimensions LLC, Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC, and Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Respondents argued that the discovery they sought from Infographics was relevant to their allegation that Complainants Duggal Dimensions LLC, Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC, and Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:25 am by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 8 (dated April 13, 2011) denying a motion to compel filed by Complainants Duggal Dimensions, LLC, Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC, and Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:44 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Detractors no doubt will argue that Hall Street stands for the proposition that courts may not review an arbitral award for errors in the application of law because such a review is not contemplated by the limited vacatur grounds set forth in Section 10 of the FAA. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:27 pm by WIMS
[*Energy/OCS]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:26 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Gaitis Last week’s United States Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]