Search for: "Big 5 Corp" Results 741 - 760 of 1,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 5:22 pm by Sam E. Antar
On November 5, 2010, Michelle Stacy exercised 10,000 options at $6.20 per share and simultaneously sold her shares at $35 per share. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
High Point Furniture Corp., 23 Misc.3d 142(A) (App. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
From the inception of the federal securities laws, companies could choose to offer to the broad investing public by taking on substantial disclosure obligations in exchange for exclusive access to the relatively unlimited pool of public capital; private companies, on the other hand, had to raise capital from insiders or certain large financial institutions, and were subject to restrictions on transfer and resale.[5] Private markets were meant to be the exception to the proverbial rule. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
More recently, on March 31, 2016, the SEC charged Navistar International Corp. with misleading investors about its development of an advanced technology truck engine and its potential certification by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
That's a really big deal, because right now, there isn't any proven cure at all. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:43 am
  For a movie to be on my list   it has to be something I have seen within the last 5 years. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Boeing Company, Criminal Action No. 4:21-cr-5-O, February 9, 2023. [9] Press Release, U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *5-6 (citing Weedon v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am by Ron Coleman
 Well, here’s what happened, per Tiffany at the Duets Blog again: Tiffany and Company was awarded nearly $16 million against Costco Wholesale Corp. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lockheed Martin Corp., settled for $62 million, earning the firm an eye-opening $22.3 million in fees and expenses. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
Note: Not a big point, but IBP is not a Delaware precedent, it is a Delaware court applying NY law. 5. [read post]